Bono won’t develop Africa and neither will you Mister Campaigner

Messiah complex? Bono in Tanzania

Messiah complex? Bono in Tanzania

You know the saying, ‘when elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers’? Well, once again, we ‘voiceless’ Africans are being used as pawns in other peoples fight.  Best selling author and Guardian newspaper contributor George Monbiot penned a piece in the publication that induced waves of disgust to wash over me.

The article, ‘Bono can’t help Africans by stealing their voice’, is scathing to the extreme. The author calls the pop star a land grabber, a muzzler of African voices and a front for Western business interests. All in all, if Mr.Monbiot is to be believed, Bono is cross between British colonialist Cecil Rhodes and Heart of Darkness’s Mr Kurtz. A very bad man.

He writes that Bono and his ONE campaign has ‘ seized the political space which might otherwise have been occupied by the Africans about whom they are talking’. Funny enough, the African leaders and businesspeople who ARE working with Bono are Uncle Tom-ish in their devotions to the western way of doing things.

He accuses six African governments of “ignoring the voices of their own people”, to strike deals with “companies such as Monsanto, Cargill, Dupont, Syngenta, Nestlé and Unilever, in return for promises of aid by the UK and other G8 nations”. He goes on to undermine the two African members of Bono’s ONE campaign, Mo Ibrahim and Nigeria’s Finance Minister Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, insinuating that they can’t represent Africa’s poor because they aren’t poor themselves.

Before I begin, I must state that I have my own issues with the Bonos’ and Madonnas’ of this world. While I believe that their hearts are in the right place (at least most times anyway), their real impact on the ground in negligible to say the least.  This is true, not only for the pop stars, but almost any kind of NGO on the continent. While these NGO’s, campaigns and what not, are able to change a few lives I must admit, they are unable to lift entire countries out of poverty. Only the state is able to. so, I am certainly not on Bono’s side. However, I am certainly not on Monbiot’s either.

Monbiot accuses Bono of stealing Africa's voice and then proceeds to do the same

Monbiot accuses Bono of stealing Africa’s voice and then proceeds to do the same

He’s right to say that that Bono can’t help Africans by stealing our voices, but in his article, Monbiot is guilty of doing the same. While he attacks Bono for not having enough Africans on his NGO’s board of governors, even the two Africans on it are not African enough for his taste. Why? Because they are rich, powerful and successful? Who are the ‘real Africans’ that you want on the board? The illiterate, starving, jigger-infested type that you see on television? This reminds me of the time that I was accused of not being a ‘real’ Rwandan by a foreigner friend of mine during a debate about rural development. I was too “North American” (read civilized) in their opinion to understand what the average villager went through.

Well, as an ‘African voice’ I would like to respond to Mr. Monbiot. I would love it if companies like Monsanto, Dupont, Nestlé and Unilever came to Rwanda (with or without promises of aid). In fact, if RDB got even one of them to invest in Rwanda I would do a jig of celebration. I honestly wouldn’t mind Monsanto’s entry into our market. Our agricultural export sector would grow as a result and so would our tax receipts as a result.

Those companies have made the West rich, why should they be stopped from doing the same here? Are we doomed to have hectares and hectares of arable land that isn’t exploited because we must remain ‘pristine’? I’m sure that is what Monbiot and other western liberals wish. That way they can fly in, travel across our countries in air conditioned cars, take pictures of themselves holding snot-covered children and marvel at the ‘primitiveness’ of it all. All before flying back home to live their comfortable lives. To them I say, thanks and no thanks. We know what we want. Sorry if it’s not yours or Mr. Bono’s version of Africa, Mr. Monbiot.


5 thoughts on “Bono won’t develop Africa and neither will you Mister Campaigner

  1. Davy says:

    Sunny some of your editorials are basically gut bursting scream laugh material. I appreciate the tone in which you voice your discontent with Mr. Monbiot’s expose and your effort to bring to light the underlying agenda you believe he, along with his Western Big-Money cohorts, are attempting to promote. There are certainly environmental components that I wish you would have made mention of and considered when reaching said opinion. However, opinions (be they political) are as individualized as genetic coding. As the French saying goes: “les gouts et les couleurs…”.

  2. Cher-Wen says:

    Agreed that non-African voices shouldn’t posture in an attempt to represent the best interests of the continent (even if they are taking down fools like Bono), and on the charge of people using the term ‘real African’ to blundering effect.

    However, let’s be clear on your last, bold statement – Monsanto doesn’t make countries rich, it makes itself rich. This isn’t just a touchy-feely ‘let’s keep Rwanda green for the sake of spectacular,sweeping views after my gorilla hike’ argument. I think Rwanda’s farmers have the right to make their own choices about the fertilizer, seed, and other agricultural inputs that they use. That’s quite different from inviting a greedy, land-grabbing, farmer-squashing monster like Monsanto through your front door. True, Rwanda’s tax receipts might grow fatter, but their farmers would take a big hit.

    I wish my own government hadn’t bent their backs to the idiocy of tending to Monsanto’s every need. I’d like to think that Rwanda would have a better fate than us, in this arena.

  3. Joseph Mamalu says:

    “only the state is able to” lift an entire country out of poverty??!! Do you care to expand on this statement?

    • sure joseph,
      NGO’s by their very nature concentrate on their area of expertise. So, they will build a well, a classroom, or give free out medicine. However, poverty is all-encompassing. NGO’s treat the symptoms of poverty, but only the State has the ability to, for example, train the teachers in those classrooms, to negotiate with investors, influence tax policy etc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s